EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP
PROGRAMS
"To Own or Not to Own,
That is the Question"
What
are the theoretical justifications for EO?
****Employee Ownership fundamentally changes the relationship
between capital and labor****
****Employee Ownership enables a social rate of return vs. a
private rate of return****
Overview
Theorists will argue that numerous economic development strategies,
of which EO is one, can be grouped into five categories:
-
Export Based
-
Adjustment
-
Technology Diffusion
-
Entrepreneurship: Niche Filling
-
Entrepreneurship: Niche Finding
Each of the categories provides a different means to achieve the
common goals of wealth creation and maintenance. Let's focus on the
first two groups of strategies: export-based and adjustment strategies.
Each of the strategies within these categories seeks to answer a certain
question or group of questions concerning the relationship between the
economy and place. For example, export-based strategies seek to answer
how a place grows. Although adjustment strategies are also concerned
with growth, these group of strategies seek to help a place rebound (or
adjust to) from economic decline. The focus of the questions is slightly
different, but both draw upon the Neoclassical and Culmulative-Causation
models. The diagram below maps the connection
between the classification of strategies (i.e. export-based or adjustment),
the key questions these strategies seek to answer, and the major economic
growth theories underpinning the strategies.
return
to top of page
Theory behind EO
****Employee Ownership fundamentally changes the relationship
between capital and labor****
****Employee Ownership enables a social rate of return vs. a
private rate of return****
-
One of the key differences between EO and the export-based strategies is
that EO focuses on INDIVIDUALS rather than FIRMS.
-
EO approaches the economic adjustment process from a MICRO rather than
MACRO level.
-
EO seeks to answer the question, "How can we stop this region or city or
neighborhood from declining?" by looking inside the structure of the firm
at the individuals, or workers, or laborers.
-
In contrast, export-based strategies (i.e. location incentives, sports
complexes, and casino gambling) all strive to answer the question, "How
do regions grow?" from a macro level. With export-based strategies,
there is a greater emphasis on the firm and the impact at the state or
regional level. Export-based strategies do not seek to examine the
inner structures or relationships of the firm; they simply want to attract
businesses to an area and reap the economic benefits of serving a population
which often does not live in the immediate area.
-
The two economic growth theories which can be used to justify EO programs
are the Neoclassical model and the Culmulative
Causation model.
-
The Neoclassical model is a staple in the world of economics. One
of its fundamental assumptions is the Constant Returns to Scale Production
function. According to this function, capital (K) and labor (L) are
completely separate entities. According to the Neoclassical model,
a place will be able to adjust to an economic shock without any outside
intervention. The model goes on to argue that any intervention may
actually be harmful in the adjustment process. However, by its very
nature, EO changes the relationship between capital and labor.
-
The Cumulative Causation model may not be as familiar to those trained
in the economic mainstream. Developed during the 1950's and 1960's,
the Cumulative Causation model is basically a descriptive model which relaxed
the constant returns to scale assumption. Once this assumption is
relaxed, according the Cumulative Causation model an economy may experience
a shock and not be able to recover on its own. Therefore, some sort
of intervention is required to help the economy recover. EO can play
the role of the intervenor and thus help the place recover from the economic
shock. For example, a large branch manufacturing plant may be closing
in a small town because the private rate of return on the investment in
that particular plant does not meet the headquarter office's standards.
However, if the employees take ownership of the plant, they may be willing
to accept a lower, social rate of return, and thus keep the plant in operation.
| Neoclassical Model |
-
Constant Returns to Scale Production function:
Y=A(t)f(KtLt)
-
EO changes the fundamental relationship between capital and labor
|
| Culmulative Causation Model |
-
Non-constant Returns to Scale
-
Economic Shock without adjustment or recovery
-
EO enables a social rate of return vs. a private rate of return
|
return
to top of page
Topics
In order to learn more about other economic development
strategies, please browse through the
Economic
Development Strategies Home Page
Please Send Questions or Comments to
Liz Kehrberger at
kehrberg@email.unc.edu
Last Updated: April 27, 1999